RENEWABLES vs NEW ENERGY
Cost Comparison


WILL TRADITIONAL RENEWABLES LIKE WIND, SOLAR AND BIOFUEL HAVE A FUTURE AS MAJOR ENERGY SUPPLIERS AND CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ?
Climate change experts 'lose faith' in traditional renewable technology: Specialists less optimistic that wind, solar and hydro power have 'high potential' to solve climate crisis.
- UN / World Bank Survey of 1.000 "climate decision makers"
- The Guardian
Biofuel plan will cause rise in carbon emissions
Britain's promise to more than double its use of biofuels by 2020 is "significantly" adding to worldwide carbon emissions, the Government admitted yesterday.
- The Independent
EU Biofuels Goals May Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions,
Lobby Groups Say Biofuels targets in the European Union could raise emissions of greenhouse gases because forests and wetlands will be destroyed to grow the crops necessary, nine environmental groups said in a study.
- Source: Bloomberg
Statkraft backing out of traditional Solar Power
Statkraft, one of our earliest New Energy Consultant customers, is now to sell its solar project company. The sale comes shortly after Statkraft decided to focus its strategy on the core businesses of hydropower, wind power, gas power and district heating.
Statkraft may now be ready for New Energy Technologies
Japan has disconnected destabilising wind
turbines from their electric grid
"Basically, governments have allowed the buildup of wind without thinking through the grid consequences," Oxford University economist Dieter Helm told ClimateWire. "There are two responses: Stop wasting so much on the rapid development of wind and its questionable economics, or plough on regardless, in which case enormous grid investments are urgently needed.
"March 1, 2011 by Jeremy Lovell in New York Times
With New Energy Technologies decentralised power systems, (off-grid) that do not need enormous grid investments (as do Wing & Solar), are possible. Energy can be generated were energy is needed without need for major, costly SuperGrid!
This makes New Energy even more cost effective than the Old Renewables, Wind & Solar.
The traditional Renewables seam to be "too little too late" to make any significat difference either as real energy suppliers or as any real climate solution technologies.
The newset traditional energy scenarios of 2020, 2035 & 2050 tell us: Enormous increase in the need for energy were most of the increase will be covered by Oil, Gas & Coal, and the support from the "Old" Renewables show that it is difficult to trust them as our "Climate Saviours of The Future".
The Rising Global Energy Demand til 2050:

“What we are going to have to do at a global scale is
create a new system, so we need energy miracles.”
Bill Gates at the TED Conference on February 12, 2010
The "Old" renewables, Wind, Solar, Geothermal are in this leading traditional energy scenario forecasted to grow from 2020 till 2050, but still only to cover a very minor part of our need for energy in 2050. and in no way show relief for the climate crises:

In these new traditional Energy Scenarios there are clearly no solutions for the major global climate crises ... We all need something NEW ... and that might well be low-cost, efficient New Energy Technologies with no CO2-emissions or radiation problems.
NOT EVEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANISATIONS KNOW ABOUT, NOR PROMOTE REAL CLIMATE SOLUTIONS:
Even environmental organisations like Bellona does not (officially) know about the Climate Solutions represented by the New Energy Technologies. See this new Bellona scenario, it really does not include any realistic solutions to the major problem facing us, Global Warming. This scenario for 2050 does even include CCS which is not at all a sustainable climate solution :
New Energy Climate Solutions are totally missing for the new Bellona forecast, stating that Wind & Solar and Bioenergy with CCS is the best we will have even in 2050. Nothing new & promising on the Bellona horizon.
The Energy Industry is advised, from environmental organisations, through misleading statements & reports like this:
“The Energy Report
- A fully sustainable and renewable global energy system is possible by 2050”
by WWF (2011)
This seriously misleading energy report (The Energy Report from WWF) states that the overall energy supply will be based on Coal, Natural Gas, Oil, Hydropower and the Old Renewables like Wind, Solar, Bio, Geothermal, Wave and Tidal in the year 2050.
The report from WWF, and the consultant company they have chosen, does not mention any of the emerging and scientifically verified New Energy Sources & and patented Technologies with validated working prototypes.
The report from WWF might be seen as outdated even before it was published!
The WWF Energy Report represent yet an other "expert report" on the future of energy and the climate that seriously misleads management in major co-operations as well as our politicians into believing that the "Old Renewables” will be the "Climate Solution Technologies".
The lack of knowledge of modern energy developments & possibilities that WWF here so clearly show, with this report, has a serious effect on the development of solutions to our most pressing danger: The Climate Change.
That WWF and their selected Energy Consultant Company have used 2 years on the preparation of The Energy Report that might be seen as a provocation in itself, since the real Climate Solution Technologies were not mentioned at all in their report!
WWF should contemplate issuing a revised version of the report as soon as possible using a consultant company that have extended knowledge of both the areas of Oil, Gas, Coal, Nuclear and the Old Renewables as well as the emerging New Energy Technologies. Only in that way WWF will be able to show the world a future with a realistic energy mix that does not create CO2 or dangerous nuclear radiation.
WILL NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES BE A MAJOR PART OF THE FUTURE ENERGY MIX AND REPRESENT CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ?


Both these real & working New Energy Technologies, that are patented/patent pending as well as Scientifically verified in University Tests, will be able to compete with any traditional Renewable Energy System (including Offshore Wind Farms).
These New Energy technologies (near marked introduction) will beat any renewables on energy production, stability, maintenance and most importantly on price kW installed as well as on price kWh.
New Energy Technology + 100 gram metal + 2 gram hydrogen =
The energy in 2000 kilo of Oil
One verified New Energy Technology now produce 18MWh using 100 metal and 2 grams hydrogen in fuel. If the same energy (18 MWh) should have been produced using oil, one would need 2000 kilo oil.

COST COMPARISON RENEWABLES vs NEW ENERGY
Here are examples of the comparison of cost (price for each kW real production capability installed) for Renewables, represented here by the Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm under construction by Norwegian Companies in the UK. This cost comparison include 3 selected New Energy Technologies that are scientifically verified and near marked introduction:
To be able to compare the cost of kW installed for a Wind Farm that has varable energy production with the cost of kW installed for a New Energy Technology system with stable continous energy production, we have to look at the average energy production (load factor) from each system:
Renewable: Sheringham Shoal Wind Farm (317 MW name plate capacity): The Norwegian Companies now constructing the Sheringham Shoal Wind Farm in the UK use a load factor of above 39 % in their calculation for the energy produced if they are going to deliver the amount of electricity a year that they state. This exceptional high load factor is not something one can see from other existing Offshore Wind Farms in UK. In 2009 the load factor for Offshore Wind Farms in UK was only 26 % (that was even lower than onshore UK wind farms in 2009). The average load factor for Offshore Wind Farm in UK for the years 2005 -2009 was only 27,6 % and we will use that somewhat more realistic loaf factor of 27,6 % in these comparisons.
Ref: UK Offshore Wind Farm load factor was just 26 % in 2009 re: UK Energy Statistics 2010 www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/statistics/.../dukes/313-dukes-2010-ch7.pdf
Offshore Wind Farm: 315 MW name plate capacity = 315 x 27,6 / 100 (27,6 % real capacity) = 85,6 MW real average generating power
The Project state a kW installed name plate cost of: 5678 USD / kW continuos power installed using 317 MW name plate capacity.
With a realistic capacity factor of 27 % (including maintenance) then the cost of comparable kW installed continuos power would be:
Cost kW installed comparable: 1800 / 85,6 = 21.028 USD / kW continuos power installed ( = 116.020,- NOK)
Comparing cost kW installed (installed real generating capacity) for Sheringham Shoal Wind Farm (UK) with selected New Energy Technologies:
The Sheringham Sohlan Wind Farm is estimated to cost 1.800.000.000 USD installed. And have a name plate capacity of 317 MW. ( Note: This capacity for a wind farm is not real usable capacity. It required full storm all year without any downtime for maintenance to generate this type of capacity. It might be seen as quite misleading statements when Wind Farm companies and Governments claim this they will now install a 317 MW Wind Farm when in reality You only get around 1/3 of that, at best.
Example 1: Sheringham Sohlan Wind Farm vs New Energy Technology type LENR Activator:
New Energy Technology 1: 2.000 USD pr. kW installed and kWh is estimate to between from 1 to 4 US Cent.
New Energy Technology 1 cost 9,5 % (2000 USD / 21.028 USD x 100 = 9,5 %) of the Norwegian owned Sheringham Shoal Wind Farm (UK) now under installation for the same power (kW) installed
Example 2: Sheringham Sohlan Wind Farm vs New Energy Technology type Electron-Transition-Direct-Electric-Conversion System:
New Energy Technology 2 cost 25 USD / kW installed continuos power. This is the world´s cheapest energy technology being designed and it is CO2-free.
New Energy Technology 2 cost 0,12% (25 USD / 21.028 USD x 100 = 0,12%) of the Norwegian owned Sheringham Shoal Wind Farm (UK) now under installation for the same power (kW) installed. The cost for kWh will be from 1 US cent to 4 US cent pr. kWh.
Example 3: Sheringham Sohlan Wind Farm vs New Energy Technology type Electro-Transition-Heat System converted to electricity through traditional systems:
New Energy System 3 cost 1400 USD / kW continuos power installed.
New Energy Technology 3 cost 6,7% (1400 USD / 21.028 USD x 100 = 6,66 %) of the Norwegian owned Sheringham Shoal Wind Farm (UK) now under installation for the same power (kW) installed.
The cost estimates for these selected New Energy Technologies are performed by leading engineering companies and scientists.
These three examples of cost comparisons for Renewables vs New Energy show clearly that the "old", traditional Renewables will soon face a very different economic future:
The selected New Energy Technologies use here are just some few of the many emerging low-cost & green technologies that You can learn about from the New Energy Consultant, Enerley.com. Contact us here.
Energy all comes down to Cost, Production & Emissions, so how is Traditional Renewables going to compete in the New Energy World?

This statement from "European Wind Energy Association" (EWEA) show even they do not know what powerful new competition the Wind Energy Industry & Investors are facing. See also this new Quote from EWEA showing lack of knowledge regarding status of developments in modern clean energy technologies:

DO LEADING ENERGY & ECONOMY ADVISORS, OIL & GAS MANAGEMENT OR ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANISATIONS KNOW THAT EFFICIENT NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES ARE EMERGING?
"At the current pace of research and development, global oil will run out 90 years before replacement technologies are ready,"
- says a new University of California, Davis, study based on stock market expectations.
- The forecast was published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology and it is based on the theory that long-term investors are good predictors of whether and when new energy technologies will become commonplace.
________________________________________________
"OIL, GAS & NUCLEAR POWER... the Day After Tomorrow?"
Most Managers and Experts in Oil, Gas & Renewables believe some,
yet unknown,
Clean Energy Technologies with competitive power/cost will arrive from somewhere sometime around
....... like in 2030 - 2050.
Learn why this misconception is dangerously wrong for any Manager, Expert & Investor in the Energy Sector.
Management in Major Oil & Gas and Renewable Energy Companies do not know who their real Competitors are!
________________________________________________
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
- Victor Hugo
WILL THE MANY EMERGING NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES TAKE OVER FOR THE OLD RENEWABLES?
A clean answer is, ... If You are looking at the facts in an objective way: ... Y E S !
The Old Renewables like Wind Farms, Solar Power and Bio Fuel can not compete with
New Energy Technologies on:
Price pr. kW installed
Price pr. kW produced
Power Production,
Efficiency of use
Decentralisation (Grid Free Systems)
Use in transport, ships & aviation
More than 13 different types of New Energy Sources / Solutions are under rapid development
by over 20 different New Energy Companies, Inventors and Organisations in many countries:
Enerley.com, the leading New Energy Consultant Company are Performing New Energy Consultant & Development work for Major Oil & Gas Companies, Large Energy Research Establishments, Leading Renewable Energy Companies, Energy Distribution Industry, Governments & Organisations.
..... it is all happening "under the radar of main-stream media"......
Request Services from Enerley.com, Established 1994 as Institute for Energy Technology Assessment (IETA), and take part in the New Energy of the Future that begins NOW !
Project Manager Oil & Gas: “
- Wind Farms & Solar Power are too little too late to be any real Climate Solutions”
In the “World Energy Outlook 2008” the International Energy Agency (IEA)
calls for “A Global Energy Revolution Despite Economic Crisis”
When IEA has Wind & Solar why do they the call for
“A Global Energy Revolution Despite Economic Crisis”
... is it because IEA also know that Wind & Solar are too little too late?
.....and that Revolution (New Energy) has now started
Unknown to most, even to advisers and energy experts guiding Management in major Oil, Gas & Renewables, there are several New Sources of Clean, CO2-free Energy under rapid Development.
Enerley.com focus only on verified New Energy Technologies with working Prototypes / Processes that generate low-cost CO2-free energy for a clean New Energy Frontier.
NEW ENERGY FRONTIERS:
Why 2011 might be the beginning of the end for Traditional Renewables like Wind & Solar
Learn more
New Energy Technologies are NOT some vague energy concept for the future. It is real NOW, have been validated, tested, patented and will soon enter the marked place and change all energy scenarios with serious consequences & major opportunities
Industry R&D: 25 % vs Oil & Gas R&D: 0,3 %
If You now after being introduced to the New World of New Energy still wonder why these modern energy technologies with patents & working prototypes not already have been on the marked for years, think about the fact that the communication industry invest 25 % in R&D and create amazing new technologies like iPhone, iPad, Androids, even Google, etc. and "The Big Oil & Gas" invest only 0,3 % in R&D (Ref: "Post-Partisan Power"How a Limited and Direct Approach to Energy Innovation Can Deliver Clean Cheap Energy, Economic Productivity, and National Prosperity" )
IT IS NOT SO STRANGE THAT WE STILL MOSTLY USE COAL, OIL & GAS AND NUCLEAR POWER ..... It is only a matter of priority ... New Energy Technologies are available for R&D and marked introduction. What “Big Oil & Gas” and Governments should have done years ago, now private New Energy Development Companies with private investors have been working on for over 20 years and we NOW see the fantastic results:
THE NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES




































